Search for: "U.S. v. Land*"
Results 8161 - 8180
of 12,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 2:52 pm
According to the Wall Street Journal, as of 2003, U.S. regulators decided that remote-controlled safeguards, known as acoustical valves, needed more study; and a report commissioned by the MMS said “acoustic systems are not recommended because they tend to very costly. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:32 am
Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185, 195-96 (1990). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
California Coastal Comm’n (1987) 483 U.S. 825 (Nollan) and Dolan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 3:32 pm
Howey, 328 U.S. 293 (1946) and Reves v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
Brown (formerly known as Perry v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:14 pm
Omnicare, Inc., 2010 U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:25 am
Howey, 328 U.S. 293 (1946) and Reves v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
See, e.g., Halstead v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
In August 2017, a U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:35 pm
Playboy, 529 U.S. at 815 (internal citation omitted). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:54 pm
Wilkey v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Series on Native Sovereignty in U.S Supreme Court Cases On Indigenous Peoples’ Day, Reflections on Tribal Sovereignty in Haaland v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:00 pm
The second case we consider is U.S. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:58 am
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982), or leaves land "without economically beneficial or productive options for its use," Lucas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 5:17 pm
SGS Control Servs., Inc., 2007 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
CentiMark Corp., the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:28 am
Western Watersheds ProjectDocket: 10-1290Issue(s): 1) Whether plaintiffs have Article III standing to facially challenge the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
CentiMark Corp., the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
In Webb v. [read post]
