Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 8161 - 8180 of 14,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Ronald Mann
This is the second decision in the past month, following Wilkins v United States, reversing a lower court holding that a particular statute is jurisdictional, ruling instead that the statute is merely a “precondition to relief. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am by Ronald Mann
  Again, the strong reliance on those requirements is a bold move; the argument on this point closely resembles the argument that the United States presented in Mayo to no avail. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:07 am by Brianne Gorod
  And the Framers included the Recess Appointments Clause to preserve the ‘vigour of government’ at times when an important organ of Government, the United States Senate, is in recess. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Susan Landau
Securing the nation is no longer a matter of protecting against physical invaders at the borders (a situation in which the United States has had tremendous geographic advantages compared with most other nations). [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:52 pm
Introduction An estimated 11.6 million unauthorized aliens [1] are currently in the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
Lowe, supra.The opinion concludes its summary of the trial by explaining that Lowe moved for ajudgment of acquittal at the close of the government's case and rested without putting on his own evidence. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:49 am
Instead, the task of filling this vacuum fell entirely to the Supreme Court, which began that effort with the most famous footnote in the law - Footnote Four of United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 8:34 am
The opinion hews closely to two great precedents: Cheek, 498 U.S. at 201, and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:05 am by Orin Kerr
This ruling is in in significant tension with United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Connecticut.Workers and employers are keeping a close eye out for Wal-Mart v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:35 am by Mark Murakami
He noted that the decision relied on "spurious historical assumptions," contemporaneous common law from England and the United States, and disregarded settled U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Gregory Ablavsky
The history of Indian Territory, Oklahoma statehood, and the Creek and other Native nations is, like much Native history in the United States, tangled; if you are interested, you can find an amicus brief that I joined that delves into that complexity here. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:50 am by Phillips & Associates
The plaintiff in Avery worked for about three years as a server at “one of the finest restaurants in the United States. [read post]