Search for: ""citizen's united"" Results 801 - 820 of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 10:14 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
For some reason, the NYT is acting like it took a year to notice this hitch (which has been perfectly evident since the Citizens United litgation began in the lower courts). [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:55 am by Gordon Smith
Read fairly, Citizens United merely says that banning certain kinds of corporate expenditures infringes the constitutional interests of human beings. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:58 am by Rick Hasen
This Essay, however, emphasizes an undertheorized and often overlooked issue that Citizens United, perhaps unwittingly, brings to the fore: the First Amendment rights of shareholders. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:03 am
Citizens United - Supreme Court - United States - Government - Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:48 pm by brettb
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United vs. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
I cannot agree that [the majority’s] “Montana is unique” rationale is consistent with Citizens United.... [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:10 pm by Tom Smith
Every Democrat in the Senate is backing a constitutional amendment that aims to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:15 am by Matt Sundquist
” Elsewhere, commentators analyze how Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 12:42 pm by Rick Hasen
The post As Supreme Court Sets TikTok Case for Oral Argument, Senator McConnell, Champion of First Amendment in Citizens United, Files Amicus Brief Saying Government Can Shut Down Platform to stop “deployment of subversive enemy propaganda through algorithmic curation. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:39 pm by Rick Hasen
Herrnson’s research shows that by the end of 2010 – less than 12 months after the landmark Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:26 pm by Rick Hasen
And the use of Citizens United as an excuse is wrong. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:42 am by Big Tent Democrat
Citizens United will also have a deleterious effect on the Court itself. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:20 am by Matt Sundquist
Court-watchers are still analyzing and tracking reactions to last week's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:51 am by Rick Hasen
  At best, Citizens United provided indirect legal cover for Mr. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:24 pm by Rick Hasen
Given that these legislative and judicial convictions retain their vitality even after Citizens United, the Court must modify the Citizens United regime to accommodate this view of corruption. [read post]