Search for: ""duty to warn"" Results 801 - 820 of 1,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am by Allred & Allred
They also have a duty to warn of known (or reasonably knowable) side effects of a certain drug. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Specifically, we concluded that the trial court was under no duty to warn the defendant of the possibility of deportation before accepting his guilty plea3 because "deportation was a collateral consequence of conviction peculiar to the individual's personal circumstances and one not within the control of the court system". [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:33 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
They are alleging that the company owed a duty to warn of dangers involved in owning a rat as a pet, and breached that duty by failing to provide such a warning when it sold the boy the rat. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am by Allred & Allred
They also have a duty to warn of known (or reasonably knowable) side effects of a certain drug. [read post]
However, the court also rejected this claim, finding that since the plaintiff assumed the risks involved in skiing off-trail, the resort did not owe him a duty to warn of the conditions. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 11:18 am by Yash Naidoo
Therefore there was no duty to warn the woman of such a risk, and no need to decide on the question of materiality. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:14 am by Kimberly Bishop
If there is an obvious hole, the landowner has no duty to warn the guest, because a reasonable person should have seen the hole. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:02 am by Brian
They also have a duty to warn patients when there are risks associated with taking the drug. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 10:30 am by Lindsay Offutt
The petitioner argues that it should not be liable for the asbestos injuries when it sold non-asbestos containing equipment to the Navy: “Petitioners had no duty to warn about asbestos added to their equipment years or even decades after its sale. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm by Mike Danko
In short, the Court ruled that while a manufacture has a duty to warn the user about the dangers of a product and how to avoid injury, it does not have a duty to train the user. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:50 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
On the merits, the court found that the plaintiff failed to establish that a shoulder dystocia occurred on her first delivery, thereby relieving the defendant of the duty to warn the plaintiff of any material risks or dangers regarding the delivery of her second child. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Brian
Drug manufacturers have a legal and ethical duty to warn patients about potential risks and to remove drugs from the market/not place them on the market if they are harmful. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
It is often hard to think that you were working with fatal substances and no one warned you. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
In other words, property owners have a duty to warn visitors of known dangers that are hidden and to take reasonable precautions against dangers that are foreseeable. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:12 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Under the GTLA, a plaintiff making a premises liability claim must prove that “(1) the governmental entity owns and controls the location or instrumentality alleged to have caused the injury; (2) a dangerous, defective, or, in the case of sidewalks, unsafe condition caused the injury; (3) the governmental entity had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition; and (4) the governmental entity breached either its duty to eliminate the condition or its duty to… [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:55 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
More Blog Posts: Maryland Court Examines a Manufacturer’s Duty to Warn Household Members in Asbestos Case, Maryland Personal Injury Blog, published June 2, 2017 Maryland Court Rules Asbestos Defendants May Be Liable for Failure to Warn About Replacement Parts, Maryland Personal Injury Blog, published March 19, 2016 The post Maryland Court of Appeals Holds Pipefitter May Sue Corporation Decades After Asbestos Exposure appeared first on Maryland Personal Injury Blog. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 6:07 pm by axd10
Parallel Proceedings in the Post-Enron Era: The Duty to Warn and the Cse for Abolishing the Government Misconduct Test. 58 Cathol Univ Law Rev 199 (2008). [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:12 am by Law Office of Michael D. Maurer, P.A.
The appellate court explained that although property owners are supposed to use reasonable care for those they invite onto the property, there isn’t a duty to warn against dangers that are actually known about or that are obvious. [read post]