Search for: "AC v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm by Howard Knopf
This type of response worked rather well for AC in the past following its huge 2004 setback in CCH v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Furthermore: “the UK Supreme Court has … affirmed that where a right to abortion exists the state has an obligation to facilitate its exercise and this includes prohibiting harm or hindrance outside abortion clinics: In re Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (NI) Bill [2022] UKSC 32, [2023] AC 505 [115]” [14]. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:48 pm by Howard Knopf
I shall provide two important hints.Hint #1:The source is one of the following:- Access Copyright (“AC”)- Association of Universities and Colleges Canada (“AUCC”)- Canadian Association of Research Libraries ("CARL")- Council of Ministers of Education Canada ("CMEC")Hint #2:The landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision dealing with fair dealing, namely CCH. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
The basis on which equity grants relief from the strict enforcement of a forfeiture is that it regards the forfeiture as only a security for the performance of an underlying obligation: see Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding (1973) AC 691, 723-724 per Lord Wilberforce, recently affirmed by this court in Vauxhall Motors Ltd (formerly General Motors UK Ltd) v Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd (2019) UKSC 46; (2020) AC 1161, para 17. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Trust Co. v Flagstar Capital Mkts., 32 NY3d 139, 145-146 [2018]; ACE Sec. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Roederer keeps its bottle while Cava loses its sparkleRoederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Does an independent analysis back up the claims of efficiency made to the AC? [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
As Viscount Simon LC observed in  Nokes v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd [1940] AC 1014, 1022, Parliament would legislate only for the purpose of bringing about an effective result. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
That doctrine was developed in Bulli Coal Mining Co v Osborne [1899] AC 351 which found that limitation would not be applied “in the case of concealed fraud, so long as the party defrauded remains in ignorance without any fault of his own” and also rejected the idea that “active concealment was essential”. [read post]