Search for: "Adams v. United States" Results 801 - 820 of 2,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
United States, a challenge to the use of a state burglary conviction as a basis for enhancing a sentence for a federal crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:29 am by Marie Nganele
State of Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
Here is an early result of the pernicious decision in Herring v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:03 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison looks at the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
In this case, the Plaintiff (Sacklow) petitioned the court to change their only child’s name from Veronica Betts to Trevor Adam Betts. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
In this case, the Plaintiff (Sacklow) petitioned the court to change their only child’s name from Veronica Betts to Trevor Adam Betts. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm by The Charge
This was - and is - the promise of the Confrontation Clause.For the last several years, the Supreme Court of the United States has reflected upon the meaning of confrontation without much resolution. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:08 am
The “next” US Supreme Court term has already started; although the Court traditionally begins its term on the first Monday in October, this month had oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:35 am by Adam Chandler
United States, in which the Court held that fleeing from a police officer in a car is a “violent felony” for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
A more likely interpertation is, that materials purchased for mass production of such videos crossed state lines, is what Congress had in mind, not the construction used to charge Blum in this case.For reasons that are a mystery to this writer, it seens this was not brought up on appeal, and the appeals court went off on a tangent of possession of child porn, see appellate court decision: USA -v- Gregory Blum . [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:35 am by Conor McEvily
United States, in which the Court held that the federal income tax liability resulting from petitioners’ post-petition farm sale is not incurred by the estate under Section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and thus is neither collectible nor dischargeable in the Chapter 12 plan. [read post]