Search for: "Andrews v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 5,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2021, 7:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
White (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, October 8, 2021 Tags: Capital allocation, Executive Compensation, Liquidity, Market conditions, Repurchases, Shareholder value SEC Form 10-K Comments Regarding Climate-Related Disclosures Posted by Brian V. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:29 am
Polat v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 4:52 pm
” Andrew Chung of Reuters reports that “U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:19 pm
Posted by Andrew J. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection Mr Andrew Prismall is bringing a representative action on behalf of approximately 1.6 million individuals whose confidential medical records were obtained by Google and DeepMind Technologies in breach of data protection laws. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:00 pm
A possession claim (Axnoller v Brake) and an eviction claim (Brake v Axnoller). [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:35 am
District Court Judge Andrew Hanen in State of Texas et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm
The current President is Sir Andrew McFarlane, who was the judge in this case. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am
Hazel, Michael V. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
This announcement follows a series of mishaps at rival right-leaning network, GB News, and the resignation of their Chairman, Andrew Neil. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
United States A Judge has ruled that three major defamation lawsuits from Dominion Voting Systems against MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell and the right-wing lawyers Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani will move forward toward a trial. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:39 am
The second, In re Boloro (Appeal nos. 2019-2349, -2351, -2353), Sept. 16, 2021, was an order by the Federal Circuit remanding the case to allow Bolero to request Director rehearing of the final written decisions in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
