Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins" Results 801 - 820 of 901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the case of Wright v McCormack [2023] EWCA Civ 892. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The answer lies in the Supreme Court’s view of what Atkins v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Texas mandate that courts deem the standard of “significantly subaverage intellectual functioning” for determining intellectual disability in Atkins v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
Canada On 30 April 2024, the Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled in favour of the applicant in the case of B.D.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of LCG v OVD, QB-2022-000921. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
Other witnesses during the week included Peter Burden and Francis Aldhouse (Monday 5 December) and David Leigh, Chris Atkins, Charlotte Harris and Steven Nott (Tuesday 6 December). [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
” IPSO 20214-23 Lunn v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach: sanction – publication of correction 20293-23 Mendes v Western Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20606-23 White v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last week. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
Wainwright, in 1986) nor the mentally disabled (Atkins v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
IPSO 00418-24 Hedges and Baker v thesun.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 00666-24 Mitchison v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 22422-23 openDemocracy v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 21812-23 Vulliamy v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach –… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2024, there was a costs hearing in Payone v Logo KB-2023-002134. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
State, 2 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 2009), mandating a cut-off IQ score of 70 or below to meet the first prong of the test for mental retardation in capital sentencing, is contrary to Atkins v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm by John Elwood
Texas, a Supreme Court decision from 2017, to find that an Ohio court unreasonably applied Atkins v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 11:03 am
The Defendant's mental condition at the time of the offense bars the adoption of the death penalty under the rationale of Atkins, 536 U.S. 304 and Roper v. [read post]