Search for: "Bader v. Roberts"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,576
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2018, 11:33 am
Pereira v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
In Monday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:32 pm
 The Court spent an hour in Florida v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
But today in Turner v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am
But yesterday brought us an administrative law undercard: argument in PDR Network v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
The last case of the March argument session, Bullard v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In part, this pattern is occurring because the New Roberts Court — the post-Ruth Bader Ginsburg composition of U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:12 pm
The Justices’ concerns Interestingly, Chief Justice John Roberts opened the questioning (he usually leaves this to other Justices, often Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg), and continued steadily through six questions over the first four transcript pages. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:10 pm
But, in fact, the oral argument Monday in Rivera v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
Roberts, Jr., and by Justices Samuel A. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is now at the chief justice’s immediate left. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:56 pm
On Tuesday, in Nieves v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:27 am
Here too Roberts was skeptical. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
” Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion in Voting Rights Act, Section 5 (Art Lien) Today’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Federal Election Commission or Schuette v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 11:43 am
Roberts suggested that Dreeben’s argument was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Riley v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:23 pm
In Stokeling v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s opinion for the court in Sessions v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
So yesterday, at a re-argument of Johnson v. [read post]