Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
(IAM) China IP peer pressure: Alibaba’s ban on optical discs (China Hearsay) Europe Europe will be the first target for major IP advocacy initiative (IAM) EU proposal seeks to make orphan works available online (IP Osgoode) Licensees, third parties and the Software Directive: a reader asks … (1709 Blog) An opinion about an opinion – what’s your opinion? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:11 am
Promissory estoppel: Barnes v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
Because both AT&T v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:25 am
If Apple wants to go west, it will want to go much further west, i.e., to the Northern District of California, its home district. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
In 2010, the US Supreme Court ruled against a California law which prohibited class action bans in consumer arbitration agreements (AT&T v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
"[13] Another court refused to read a business-interests exception into Louisiana's facially categorical ban on firing for political activity. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
(Afro-IP) Australia Australia's internet filter: could legal content be banned too? [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Surveillance Meta, the owner of Facebook, has banned seven surveillance companies for targeting users on its platforms, the BBC reports. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
., Kimsey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
Weekly D884cHOSPITAL WORKERS MUST ABIDE BY SMOKING BAN, 3RD CIRCUIT RULES, Armstrong County Mem'l Hosp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 12:40 pm
(Citing Relentless Air Racing, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
A new code of conduct will ban gifts to university personnel, require disclosures, and ban staffing of university call centers - some of the lenders would actually answer the phone "X University. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
One AI company, Anthropic, wrote to California Governor Gavin Newsom that the bill’s benefits “likely outweigh its costs. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
A long time (Patent Baristas) PPAC meeting summary (Inventive Step) Overtime ban at the USPTO (IAM) Is it time to make law firms pay for representing patent trolls? [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Stephenson alleged that the company sold posters copying her art without her permission. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am
Resources: The New Yorker: “A Facial-Recognition Tour of New York” (Jan. 15, 2024) EFF: “Clearview AI—Yet Another Example of Why We Need A Ban on Law Enforcement Use of Face Recognition Now” (Jan. 31, 2020) EFF on Face Recognition Technology Testimony of EFF’s Jennifer Lynch on Face Recognition to the House Oversight Committee (March 2017) ACLU v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
The Press Gazette had a piece “Tommy Robinson given journalist stalking ban after making threats to try and stop story being published”. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat) United States US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’… [read post]
