Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 801 - 820
of 5,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
On Nov. 23—almost three weeks after Election Day, and two weeks after the press called the election in favor of the Democratic ticket—the presidential transition finally began with a letter from General Services Administrator Emily Murphy. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
He promoted abolitionist causes until his death, 52 years before the court cemented slavery’s place in our antebellum Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:42 am
Plaid Inc and Evans v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 1:12 pm
Bryant argued that what she alleged in her complaint were bare procedural violations that did not constitute an injury-in-fact under Spokeo. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am
The oral argument transcript in California v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 10:06 am
By Colleen V. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Most people would agree that the Supreme Court is one of the most important government institutions of the United States, due to its power of judicial review rooted in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
And all of this is simply a precursor to the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
After tentatively settling a class action alleging that Godiva Chocolates violated federal law by including too many credit card numerals on its receipts, the chocolatier catches a lucky break: The en banc Eleventh Circuit (over three lengthy dissents) throws out the case on standing grounds, concluding that this "bare procedural violation" is not sufficient to cause an injury under the Supreme Court's ruling in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
In Artis v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:44 pm
No, says last Friday's Eighth Circuit decision in Craig v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
In the Pennsylvania case, Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:29 am
See RCW 29A.56.110, .140; see also Chandler v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Weiss v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
They barely ruled against Trump, because they actually agreed with the dissent. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
They barely ruled against Trump, because they actually agreed with the dissent. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The CFPB filed an amicus brief in Hopkins v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 8:49 pm
The Court’s use of good faith in Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
In Mohammad v. [read post]
