Search for: "Beach v. United States"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2021, 7:16 am
City of Hallandale Beach, Fla., 996 F.3d 1110, 1112–13 (11th Cir. 2021) (citing Lujan v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm
The protests marked the two-year anniversary Saturday of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:18 pm
The 2nd Circuit in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:15 am
In addition, following the rationale of Senda v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 pm
United States, supra, at 175, 100 S.Ct., at 390. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm
United States, 17-8 Issues: (1) Whether a tribe that opted out of the Indian Reorganization Act can have its status under the Act revived under the Indian Land Consolidation Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 10:00 am
For example, in Pharmerica, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:21 am
(Eugene Volokh) In R. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
United States, one of three cases seeking an interpretation of the federal “honest services” fraud statute. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am
The United States will not follow our lead – there are Constitutional, statutory and procedural barriers to permitting US patent applications naming non-human inventors. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Markus's blog where he has a Palm Beach Post story covering the career of the former Dade State and Federal prosecutor. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am
The United States will not follow our lead – there are Constitutional, statutory and procedural barriers to permitting US patent applications naming non-human inventors. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 8:55 am
The Commission reportedly finds that on August 31, 2018, Francis pled guilty to one count of wire fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
The Second Circuit said that “rather than looking to the identity of the parties, the type of security at issue, or whether each individual defendant engaged in conduct within the United States, we hold that a securities transaction is domestic when the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction within the United States or when title is passed with the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
The United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) has defined an establishment as a “distinct physical place of business” and not necessarily the entire business or enterprise. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Zendejas v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 4. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:37 pm
I of the 1983 Constitution of Georgia and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. [read post]
