Search for: "Booth v. Booth" Results 801 - 820 of 840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 2:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Note that suffragettes used patenting as evidence that women should have the vote—they set up a booth at the World’s Fair. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Student Presenters: Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu)The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (Lauren.feldman@jhu.edu)Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York’s Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu)Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and Regulation of Bank Holding Companies in the Twentieth… [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 4:02 pm
Rob is the acknowledged expert in the US in this area of the law and you won't want to miss his discussion on Murphy v IRS, taxable damage implications and how 468b trusts can and should be used to manage potential tax issues. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Coss, Director de 80grados y Yolanda Vélez Arcelay de Univisión Puerto Rico. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
I submitted to the SEC yesterday a comment letter on behalf of  a bi-partisan group of eighty professors of law, business, economics, or finance in favor of facilitating shareholder director nominations. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm by Bona Law PC
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am by Rui Dias
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
” The case of Martinez-Hidalgo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:24 am by Orin Kerr
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:26 am by Bill Marler
This does not apply to: (1) animal rides (including pony, camel, and elephant rides); (2) milking booths; or (3) the petting of an animal held or restrained outside of its housing area by an exhibit operator or patron as part of an educational or photographic opportunity where there is limited possibility of contact with manure and bedding. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:52 am by Bill Marler
This does not apply to: (1) animal rides (including pony, camel, and elephant rides); (2) milking booths; or (3) the petting of an animal held or restrained outside of its housing area by an exhibit operator or patron as part of an educational or photographic opportunity where there is limited possibility of contact with manure a [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:58 am by Bill Marler
This does not apply to: (1) animal rides (including pony, camel, and elephant rides); (2) milking booths; or (3) the petting of an animal held or restrained outside of its housing area by an exhibit operator or patron as part of an educational or photographic opportunity where there is limited possibility of contact with manure and bedding. [read post]