Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 801 - 820
of 4,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
In his Proclamation 5517 (1986), he justified this exclusion on the ground that he “found that the unrestricted entry into the United States as immigrants by Cuban citizens would . . . be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
United States, 21-5967Issue: Whether Zenon Grzegorczyk is entitled to relief on his claim that knowingly using a facility of interstate commerce with intent that a murder be committed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:25 pm
We all use the United States Code (U.S.C.) [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
Re: United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 8:54 am
The government’s general comment on the case is as follows: The injunction plaintiff seeks would be unprecedented, improper, and extraordinarily dangerous, regardless of the truth of his allegations (which the United States does not and cannot confirm or deny). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm
In Douglas v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Judge Walton, Sullivan says, also never found that the petitioner raised a finger against the United States or its allies. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:24 am
He is credited with having stabilized the work of the Commission during the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:24 am
He is credited with having stabilized the work of the Commission during the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:53 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
United States.[7] The Court, however, quickly backed down from its anti-delegation rule in Schechter, possibly because of FDR’s court-packing plan. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
United States, in which the court upheld the application of issue preclusion to bar relitigation of mistried counts when a defendant was acquitted of some counts and the jury hung on others. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
The United States switched sides to advocate that the statute be ruled unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
The Supreme Court endorsed such a test in a case called Boumediene v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:07 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
