Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
The new decision, In the Matter of Brooke S.B. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:48 am
And not only did Brooks get less house arrest time, as well as fewer years of probation, but she also got to serve her house arrest in a multi-million dollar New York City penthouse that, I'm quite confident, was far from the place where Edwards spent his time in Montana. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:21 am
Kappos 37 Thoughts -Decision in Bilski v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division held that Supreme Court properly directed dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against the Village for failure to comply with the notice of claim requirements of CPLR §9802, citing Nioras v Village of Rye Brook, 74 AD3d 1036, The Appellate Division's decision notes that §9802 provides that "no action shall be maintained against the village upon or arising out of a contract of the village unless the same shall be… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
We've previously noted Zachary Newkirk’s "Full Justice May Be Done Them": The Case of Bill, Charles, Jupiter, Randolph, et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:37 am
Here, with McCormick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:32 am
Brooks, 2017 WL 4158790 (2nd Cir. 2017)Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:33 am
Brooks v City of San Mateo (9th Cir. 2000) 229 F.3d 917, 929. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:11 am
In one case, People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division held that Supreme Court properly directed dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against the Village for failure to comply with the notice of claim requirements of CPLR §9802, citing Nioras v Village of Rye Brook, 74 AD3d 1036, The Appellate Division's decision notes that §9802 provides that "no action shall be maintained against the village upon or arising out of a contract of the village unless the same shall be… [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm
Brooks, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: Diane M. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:51 am
Mark Hood was the expert engineer hired by Personal Injury Lawyer Lance Copper in Melton v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Brooks v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:00 pm
Under the hypothetical facts of McCain v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:19 pm
Homer Brooke Glass Co., 249 F. 228, 232-33 (7th Cir. 1918). [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 2:10 pm
Brooks, No. 07-CR-00187 (CPS), 2008 WL 4693335, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:26 pm
Debrower v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm
Brookings v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 11:35 am
State v. [read post]
