Search for: "Brown, III. v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Emma Snell
Katelyn Polantz and Pamela Brown report for CNN. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
"International environmental norms reflect not how states regularly behave, but how states speak to each other. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In his complaint, Pappas alleged three counts: (i) judicial supervision of the winding up of the partnership under Partnership Law § 68; (ii) accounting of the partnership under Partnership Law § 74; and (iii) partition of the real estate owned by the partnership. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
The current state of the CSDDD already represents a milestone. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am by Christin Thompson
States also have the administrative authority to bar providers from participating in their State Medical Assistance Programs (primarily Medicaid and CHIP).[5] Medicaid exclusion actions[6] are similar to OIG exclusions in many respects, but there are also important differences. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19]             Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
Dearling (Hepworth Browne, Leeds) has responded to the IPKat's challenge to tell us what's going on. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Levitsky and Ziblatt have looked at examples over the last century of democratic “deconsolidation” around the world, and they’ve concluded that the primary danger to contemporary democracies is not from military coups or paramilitary brown-shirt-and-jackboot takeovers. [read post]