Search for: "Burwell v. Burwell"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
Burwell, 15-191; and Zubik v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:55 am
He concludes that it’s “[n]ot likely” but adds that “few expected the court to hear the frivolous semantic complaint known as King v Burwell last year. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court held the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) applies to regulations that govern the activities of closely held corporations in Burwell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:07 am
“As in Burwell v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:05 pm
Burwell oral argument [Hoover, earlier] With Profs. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
Supreme Court ruling in Burwell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:15 pm
Burwell, one of the cases consolidated as Zubik v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
” And at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin argues that “[r]ecent events at Guantanamo confirm the problems with the Supreme Court’s broad interpretation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in Burwell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:31 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:50 pm
Burwell, No. 13-1540, and Reaching Souls Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am
’” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie outlines what he describes as “a plausible scenario” in which the Chief Justice “may vote in the liberal direction in both King v Burwell,the Obamacare case, and Obergefell v Hodges, the same-sex marriage case. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 3:35 am
Burwell, the challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate, and what it means for women. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
Burwell generally, with a focus on the case and education for Education Week. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 10:12 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:53 am
Burwell, the ACA subsidies case. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
Burwell decision of the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
Burwell (RFRA), Burwell v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Burwell 15-35Issue: Whether the availability of a regulatory option for nonprofit religious employers to comply with the Department of Health and Human Services’ contraceptive mandate eliminates either the substantial burden on religious exercise or the violation of RFRA that this Court recognized in Burwell v. [read post]
