Search for: "COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2012, 7:25 am
The pointless burden put on innocent taxpayers by the IRS shoot-the-jaywalkers enforcement of the already ridiculous international reporting rules is most disgraceful of IRS Commissioner Shulman’s many policy blunders. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:26 am
There’s no start date yet but the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is already gearing up for what’s certain to be a difficult tax season. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:27 pm
However, "The Commissioner is in the best position to know what actions were taken by Internal Revenue Service officers and employees during the period for which petitioners' abatement request was made and during any subsequent inquiry based upon that request. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
§ 7701(a)(14) as “any person subject to any internal revenue tax. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:31 pm
They are the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:07 pm
Following up on the White House’s announcement yesterday that by major health insurers, Medicare and Medicaid to cover medically necessary testing and expand coverage for treatment of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (“coronavirus), without applying deductibles or coinsurance and offer expanded telemedicine and other coverage for coronavirus care, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) today issued guidance giving health plans confirming health plans waiving deductibles… [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:55 am
The Internal Revenue Service is warning human resources and other business leaders about a growing wave of identity theft and W-2 scams targeting sensitive tax data employers collect on their employees. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
UBS AG v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 December 2015. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:45 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 22/6/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 09/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
Target Group Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th July 2023. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 05/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Guest and another v Guest heard 3rd December 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard… [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 2:56 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 15/6/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th… [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:14 am
On Wednesday 23rd March the Court will hand down judgment in Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v NCL Investments Ltd and another, on appeal from 2020 EWCA Civ 663. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am
On Tuesday 25th January, the Court will hear Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v NCL Investments Ltd and another, on appeal from 2020 EWCA Civ 663. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:56 am
Edited for clarity, Revenue & Taxation Code 18622 provides: (a) If any item required to be shown on a federal tax return, including any gross income, deduction, penalty, credit, or tax for any year of any taxpayer is changed or corrected by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue …, that taxpayer shall report each change or correction…, within six months after the date of each final federal determination of the change or correction or… [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am
The Advocate General representing the Commissioners of HMRC v K E Entertainments Ltd (Scotland), heard 29 April 2020. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
Second, issues arising out of the case of Prudential Assurance Company Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 39. [read post]
