Search for: "COUNTS v. COUNTS"
Results 801 - 820
of 20,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2009, 3:22 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
In its April 6 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 3:37 am
It's an important distinction because one does not count as working time, while the other does. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:52 am
In Noe Romo v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:31 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:39 pm
Oral Argument in case: 08-1478; Estate Moreland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:36 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:59 pm
Failure to do so is unconstitutional and requires reversal of the conviction (id.).Five days ago, the Appellate Division, First Department, held that the rule of law announced in Catu applies retroactively to pre-Catu convictions (People v Smith, __ NYS3d __, 2015 NY Slip Op 07565 [Oct. 15, 2015]). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
The Beaver Count Court of Common Pleas recently issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Muller v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:57 pm
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York heard the case of The People of the State of New York, Respondent v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- In anticipation of tomorrow's oral argument in the rehearing en banc of Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
The court in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:00 pm
I was preparing to explore the theorizing that I and other bloggers did in the wake of Genrty that it would have implications for employment contracts in general, when I came across this footnote in the recent Murphy v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:15 am
Late last week, a federal jury came back with their verdict in the case of the United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 12:35 pm
Referring to United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:44 pm
Decision: Cheney v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:18 pm
Yarosius v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 6:56 am
On March 21, 2012, John Tuma was found guilty on all five counts under the indictment (conspiracy, obstruction and three CWA counts). [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm
Applying the AFA, the Court fined the Company the maximum penalty of $500,000 per violation on Count 1 (conspiracy), Counts 8-11 (obstruction), Counts 12-16 (CWA -- cement pit discharge), Counts 28-32 (CWA -- Number Four Pit discharge), and Count 34 (CAA) for a total fine of $8 million dollars. [read post]
