Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA" Results 801 - 820 of 1,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
“[A]n appellee is generally permitted to defend the judgment won below on any ground supported by the record without filing a cross appeal. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:35 am by Florian Mueller
But a tipping point may have been reached at which conservation will come to an end even in her district court.A few days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's motion to stay issuance of a mandate (pending a Supreme Court petition) following a recent appellate ruling on the first California Apple v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm by Florian Mueller
The only judge in the world who has held so far that Apple deserved a patent on that concept is Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm by Steven Cohen
Stephen Treiber – Supreme Court of Pennsylvania – Eastern District – August 17th, 2015) involves an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court from a PCRA opinion. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:32 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
BorgWarner Morse TEC, August 5, 2015, Court of Appeal for the State of California – Second District More Blog Entries:Australian Court Awards Highest Verdict for Asbestos Exposure Case in Nation’s History The post Soto v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:06 am
This post examines an opinion the California Court of Appeals –First District issued in People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  The district court did not certify them for appeal, and the panel declined to do so. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:54 pm
 Judge Hamilton of the US District Court for the Northern District of California granted Netflix's motions holding that all five patents were invalid. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Justice Thomas dissented, joined by Justices Kennedy and Alito.When a habeas corpus petitioner prevails and obtains relief from his judgment and the state appeals, the petitioner does not need to file a cross-appeal or get a certificate of appealability to argue other grounds rejected by the District Court, as long as acceptance of them by the Court of Appeals would not give him greater relief than he won in the District Court.I… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The trial court ruled against Petitioner SOHO on its CEQA claims, which SOHO abandoned on its cross-appeal by failing to provide supporting argument or authority in its brief. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Twelve years to the day after the Supreme Court struck down bans on sodomy in Lawrence v. [read post]