Search for: "Cable v. State" Results 801 - 820 of 1,820
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The tabloid accused Headley of being a “cosmetic cowboy”, falsely stating that she had botched the treatment of customers. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:50 am by Terry Hart
Yet, because of an ambiguity in state and federal copyright laws, artists and copyright owners who created that music receive nothing for the use of their work. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
But it's possible that they would be treated more like cable systems; the Supreme Court rejected (by a 5-4 vote) a First Amendment challenge to facially content-neutral "must-carry" statute requiring cable systems to carry broadcast channels (see Turner Broadcasting Sys. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Regulation 2(1) states that:“The articles of association of a RTM company shall take the form, and include the provisions, set out in the Schedule to these Regulations. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Regulation 2(1) states that:“The articles of association of a RTM company shall take the form, and include the provisions, set out in the Schedule to these Regulations. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:54 pm by Kali Borkoski
With this in mind, today in our discussion of FCC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by Penn Program on Regulation
 See related RegBlog post.The EPA released a report detailing the costs and benefits of the Clean Air Act between 1990 and 2010.In Williamson v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:56 pm by Deepak Gupta
"  This morning, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]