Search for: "California v. Force"
Results 801 - 820
of 6,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 6:54 pm
Tax Petitioners v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 2:47 pm
Every forceful kidnapping -- every single one that meets California's statutory requirements -- results in those harms to the victim.This seems to me a big problem with the majority's analysis. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:05 am
In Burton v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 8:39 am
” For example, under California law, assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury is not, by itself, a strike. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:15 pm
See City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:23 am
In a recent order issued in a case from the Central District of California, Nguyen v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 8:39 pm
Castaneda v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:41 pm
The opinion in Vu v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm
LEXIS 23848 (ED CA, March 15, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge concluded that inmates failed to state a claim against the California State Personnel Board in connection with their complaint that no Wiccan prison chaplains were hired for their facility.In Jackson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
11/17/2010 Update: The California Supreme Court granted review of Kirby v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:11 pm
(To be sure, it has prevailed in some other courts, including Hernandez v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 10:04 pm
[The Cato Institute's amicus brief in California v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
Agreeing with the majority opinion in Force v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:15 am
M.R.E. 315(f)(1) search authorization for Air Force member's dorm room was presented by affidavit for a search warrant, and the base commander authorized the search which could be used in civilian court. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:41 am
Rejecting the government’s analogy to California v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:51 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Doe was an ATS suit filed in 2011 against Cisco, a California-based internet technology provider, for allegedly aiding and abetting the Chinese government’s arbitrary detention and torture of dissidents. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
MAZ Encryption Technologies LLC v. [read post]
