Search for: "Case v. Sullivan"
Results 801 - 820
of 3,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
In the case of Fresenius v Baxter (Federal Circuit 2013), the issue of damages was outstanding when the PTAB invalidated the patent. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:34 pm
See Blumenthal v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:56 am
The case was argued n January, and the Court of Appeals issued this summary order on April 26, a long time for a summary order, which usually comes down a few weeks after argument.The case is Leevson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:02 pm
Sullivan, Esq. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:49 am
Sullivan and Gertz v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
This case involves an exception to the three strikes rule.The case is Shepard v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 12:00 pm
The Supreme Court emphasized the danger that defamation suits can pose to First Amendment freedoms in New York Times v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am
Sept. 27) (reluctantly allowing preliminary injunction in libel case, because a 1974 Nevada Supreme Court had allowed such injunctions); San Antonio Community Hosp. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
Ludewig, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Friday, April 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Hedge funds, Mergers & acquisitions, Proxy contests, Securities litigation, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits Merger Agreement Termination based on Plain Contract Language Posted by Paul J. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am
The one possible difference between the criminal libel trial and the criminal contempt trial in a catchall injunction case is that a jury must be provided in most criminal cases—including criminal libel cases—if the maximum statutory authorized sentence is over 6 months (or some lower threshold set by state law), but a jury must be provided in criminal contempt cases only if the actual sentence is over 6 months. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am
The one possible difference between the criminal libel trial and the criminal contempt trial in a catchall injunction case is that a jury must be provided in most criminal cases—including criminal libel cases—if the maximum statutory authorized sentence is over 6 months (or some lower threshold set by state law), but a jury must be provided in criminal contempt cases only if the actual sentence is over 6 months. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze last week’s oral arguments in partisan-gerrymandering cases , Rucho v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Other cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
They have benefited from, but did not require, the added legal sophistication provided by Mr O’Sullivan’s drafting. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm
Sullivan should be overturned. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm
Benisek, the Maryland case, and Rucho v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:15 am
Sullivan (1991)). [read post]
