Search for: "Corpus v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2016, 2:42 pm
Said that Roe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
This case is one of them.The case is Gillespe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
The habeas corpus law that Congress enacted in the mid-1990s makes it harder to challenge the constitutionality of a state court criminal conviction. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:56 am
I cannot agree with the majority‘s summary rejection of the defendant‘s unrefuted claim that the State unlawfully manufactured critical evidence against him. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
Circuit turned to this question, in the case of Hentif v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
United States was not, after oral argument, much of a surprise. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm
Constitution, he can go to federal court to seek relief – a process known as “habeas corpus. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:02 am
Bush, which allows Guantanamo Bay detainees to file habeas corpus petitions, also gives Bagram detainees access to United States courts. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Stewart Parnell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 1:05 pm
A request for federal review is called a writ of Habeas Corpus. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Martinez v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am
United States, 10-6866, and Setser v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:54 am
The case involves the interaction between harmless error analysis and the deference owed to state court decisions when an inmate takes his rejected claims to the federal courts on habeas corpus. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Circuit’s 2010 opinion in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 9:50 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
Jan. 31, 2008):As stated above, a writ of habeas corpus will not be issued unless the state court's legal conclusions are "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States," 28 U .S.C. [read post]
