Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
The Agency substantially revised the proxy rules after the DC Circuit's decision in SEC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:14 am
Dade Cnty. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:59 am
The case, The Gambia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
(relisted after the November 8 conference) United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The first, Gold v Cox ([2012] EWHC 272 (QB)) concerned the threatened publication of a book about Jacqueline Gold, the chief executive of Ann Summers. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:49 pm
* State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am
Idly fumbling through the electronic annals of Parliament House, the humble case of Daniel Cox v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:52 am
" Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:58 am
Shirvell: Motion to Dismiss [AnnArbor.com]Earlier: Lawsuit of the Day: Chris Armstrong v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
That was the case in Cox v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:48 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 5:29 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 1:43 pm
AFSCME v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:26 am
The IPKat has learned, via the UK Intellectual Property Office, of Case C-145/10 Eva-Maria Paine v Standard Verlags GmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, Spiegel-Verlag Rudolf Augstein GmbH & Co KG and Verlag M. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:20 pm
Stretching Sarbanes-Oxley Beyond Corporate Fraud Keith Bishop notes: The 11th Circuit recently rendered an interesting decision in US v. [read post]
