Search for: "DOE et al v. DOE AGENCY et al" Results 801 - 820 of 1,453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
While ABX1 27 may force cities to make tough decisions, it does not mandate any payment and, according to the State, is not prohibited by Proposition 22. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:10 am by Dennis Crouch
Amicus: ON Semiconductor Corp., et al. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's et. al., No. 08-10451 (5th Cir. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:45 am
Nev.) and SGF License, LLC v. steffigraf.com et al, Case No. 09-cv-00850 (D. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am by Evangelina Cantu
It was on the basis of that legislative limitation that state agencies in 2011 stopped analyzing impacts from GHG emissions that would result from permitted activities and that the Supreme Court held unconstitutional. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am by WIMS
Reply of petitioners Michigan, et al. filed and more. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Don Cruse
” How to restart a Texas state case after it is remanded from federal court Maria Del Carmen Gulbot Serros de Gonzalez et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:47 am
Barzilay, Judge)      SUMMARY: The action filed by Plaintiffs Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance et. al. against Defendant United States appears anew before the court on remand from the Federal Circuit. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 If the agency’s action is ministerial, CEQA does not apply. [read post]