Search for: "DOES 2-25"
Results 801 - 820
of 16,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2020, 2:54 am
The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) is organizing the 2020 IP Paralegal Conference in the online format, from September 30 to October 2. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 10:44 am
Time is of the essence, since 25 January 2013 is not a hundred years away. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
"It would have been more accurate had the appointing authority indicated that there were 25 days remaining in the employee's probationary period and that although he had completed his minimum period of probation, he had not yet attained tenure in the position and thus the employee, although appointed to the position as a permanent employee, was not entitled to a Civil Service Law §75 pretermination hearing or an equivalent disciplinary procedure set out in the… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
"It would have been more accurate had the appointing authority indicated that there were 25 days remaining in the employee's probationary period and that although he had completed his minimum period of probation, he had not yet attained tenure in the position and thus the employee, although appointed to the position as a permanent employee, was not entitled to a Civil Service Law §75 pretermination hearing or an equivalent disciplinary procedure set out in the… [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 11:59 pm
The court relied on sections 38(1) and (2) which essentially provide that use of a mark by a licensee shall be deemed to be use by the owner of the mark. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:20 am
The Board pointed out, however, that long-time use of a supposed mark does not alone establish acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
1 May 2020, 1:56 pm
In the example above, the deadline would be 25/06/2019. [read post]
1 May 2020, 1:56 pm
In the example above, the deadline would be 25/06/2019. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
German is an official language of the EPO, so the exception of Rule 36(2) does not appear to apply. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:33 am
2. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
October 27, 2022 - 2 PM: D&P Holding S.A.. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
The important thing is that they're not barred from being 'services']2. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:08 am
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 34: TTAB Dismisses Monster Energy's Section 2(d) Claim On Summary Judgment Due to DIssimilarity of Design Marks Precedential No. 29: After an Exhausting 2(d) Analysis, TTAB Finds HME (Stylized) Confusable with KME for Building Products Precedential No. 27: TTAB Renders Split Decision in Appeal From Section 2(d) Refusal of IMPACT for Various Healthcare Services Precedential No. 12: TTAB Hands… [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The EBA had held that Article 53(b) EPC does not exclude plants from patentability, even if they are obtained through an essentially biological process. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
It does not look like the Second DCA has a streaming feed at this time. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 1:10 pm
Friday, Jan. 25, with reply briefs before 2 p.m. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Ex. 2 at § IV(A)(2)). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Ex. 2 at § IV(A)(2)). [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:53 am
False trade descriptionThe Court noted that the RoT’s order does not address the issue of whether the challenged marks are prohibited as ‘false trade descriptions’ under Section 2(1)(i)(I) of the TM Act. [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:10 am
” Letter from Susan Rice, National Security Advisor, to Congress, July 25, 2014. [read post]
