Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 7:46 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:52 am
Her first post will discuss the S.A.S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
And as the Supreme Court pointed out in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
“Shrink wrap” licenses for software are a good example, where opening and using the product is a sufficient indication that the purchaser has accepted the terms of use (see ProCD, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
’ ” Id. at 1432 (quoting Dukes, 131 S.Ct. at 2551). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:36 am
Plaintiffs (and their advocates in academia) do not like the current state of the merits inquiry. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:57 am
Moore et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:50 am
In Griggs v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:48 am
At the hearing, the parties argued that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Sanford V. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:25 am
Ralf Michaels (Duke University)Against a General Jurisprudence of Pluralism. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
Grosz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
Duke Power Company, per that racial radical Warren Burger, found a disparate-impact cause of action under Title VII and, more recently in Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
Dukes More than any other development in 2014, however, the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:04 pm
The ruling is made that much worse because the Court had before it an example of how the situation should have been handled, in the case of NCTQ v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Supreme Court twice in 1888, first with The Telephone Cases (126 U.S. 1), and then with United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:19 am
Dukes, the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:46 pm
Guest post by Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Postdoctoral Associate at Duke Law School. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:38 am
However, the Ellington v. [read post]
