Search for: "Doe Governmental Agencies 1-5" Results 801 - 820 of 1,163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 5:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On August 1, 2008, petitioner again moved, by Order to Show Cause, to restore to her possession of the Premises. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:38 am by Glenn
There are four straightforward reasons FairSearch is wrong. 1. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:19 pm by Cleve Clinton
Telher failed to prove all the elements: (1) while he is a public employee; (2) who acted in good faith in making a report; (3) that involved a violation of law; (4) the report was NOT made to an appropriate law enforcement authority; and (5) even though he suffered retaliation as a result of making the report, the Texas Supreme Court held he was not entitled to relief. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
  Corporate law is grounded on agency principles articulated through our notions of "fiduciary duty." [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
  Some state’s statutes exempt conduct in "compliance" with relevant governmental oversight, which we’re taking to mean "FDA," regulations (Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:33 pm
PlainSite now has information about 100 million docket entries in almost 6 million case dockets spanning federal and state courts and agencies; 2.5 million patent applications (and growing); 5 million companies, non-profits, government agencies and law firms; over 1 million lawyers; almost 500,000 sections of laws and regulations; over 25,000 judges and examiners, and plenty of other interesting data. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Hargis Industries, Inc. 13-352Issue: (1) Whether the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s finding of a likelihood of confusion precludes respondent from relitigating that issue in infringement litigation, in which likelihood of confusion is an element; and (2) whether, if issue preclusion does not apply, the district court was obliged to defer to the Board’s finding of a likelihood of confusion absent strong evidence to rebut it. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
Code §§ 2252(a)(2) and 2252A(a)(5)(B)”. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm by Ritika Singh
(Meta-data does not include the content of calls.). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Fisher, 70 F.3d 1474, 1483 (6th Cir. 1995) (upholding a statutory accommodation that was not required by the Free Exercise Clause, on the grounds that, “The statute at issue in this litigation does not evidence governmental advancement of religion merely because special consideration is given to religious groups. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
One company, Acxiom, estimates that it holds on average approximately 1,500 pieces of data on each adult American.[10] Since most, though not all, of these records are governmental in origin, the government has equivalent access to the data, and what they cannot create themselves they can likely buy or demand from the private sector. [read post]