Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 801 - 820
of 2,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2007, 8:16 pm
Patent Nos. 4,786,505 and 4,853,230) and found that Apotex and Impax infringe the patents while Mylan and Lek (a division of Sandoz) do not. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm
The volume on The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws, edited by Sarah McKibbin (University of Southern Queensland) and Anthony Kennedy (Serle Court), recently published by Hart, does just that, by discussing cases like Vita Food Products, Brook v Brook, Bonython v Commonwealth of Australia, AG v Heinemann Publishers (better known as the Australian Spycatcher case), Bremen v Zapata, Vizcaya v Picard, and Kuwait Airways (Nos 4 and 5). [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 10:42 pm
Patent Nos. 5,577,662 and 5,535,947 (both entitled "Embedded railway track system")), right of dismissal under Fed. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:47 am
— Doe VIII v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
The appeal from SNPC and Itoua, docket nos. 06-1763-cv (L) and 06-2216-cv, came after a 2006 decision by U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 11:39 am
., Nos. 2006-1265 & 2006-1302 (Fed. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:14 am
Ex-client sues Houston’s “Car Wreck Clyde” charging case running and other no-nos [Brenda Sapino Jeffreys, Texas Lawyer] In Florida, “‘Inconspicuous’ political cash helped trial lawyers notch wins against insurers” [Matt Dixon and Arek Sarkissian, Politico] Tags: assumption of risk, class actions, COVID-19 virus, Florida, medical malpractice [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:36 pm
Nos. 2,695,589 for the logo and 2,697,721 for the word mark), and also has several pending trademark applications incorporating the word "Palermo's. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:06 am
Citizens United also does not disturb the validity of the anti-circumvention interest. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:14 am
United States Patent Nos. 5,715,314, 5,909,492, and 7,272,639. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:41 pm
Hug, 485 F.3d 926, 929 (7th Cir.2007) ("[A]n attorney can bring an appeal on her own behalf when challenging a district court decision imposing monetary sanctions on the attorney, but this rule does not allow an appeal of otherwise critical comments by the district court when no monetary sanctions have been imposed. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:18 pm
" While resolution of disputed claim terms, such as what occurred in this opinion, does not resolve the controversy entirely, it is a significant step. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:04 pm
The complaint alleges United claims to offer these trademarked goods at lower prices than JacobsParts does. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:34 am
Guthrie, Nos. 07-6215/6286 (6th Cir. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:59 am
Pedrick Distinguished Research Scholar, Professor of Law, and Executive Director, Indian Legal Program, at Arizona State University School of Law, “The Future of Tribal Self-Determination: Does U.S. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:19 am
(See Fact Nos. 6, 13, 14, 15, 16) She was working full-time (See Fact No. 25, 29) and during both periods of employment had a company credit card, company office, cell phone, laptop, email account and voicemail. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:07 am
Family, and directing that thereafter, petitionerprovide the Committee with a progress report, every six months, regarding the status of her efforts with respect to the payment plans (Motion Nos. 2022-02132 and 2022-02428), And petitioner, upon her submission of an affidavit of compliance with thisCourt’s August 2, 2022 order, sworn to on December 29, 2022, having moved this Courtfor an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.16(a) and (b) reinstating her as an attorneyand counselor-at-law in… [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:09 pm
Patent Nos. 7,292,151 (the ‘151 patent) and 7,492,268 (the ‘268 patent). [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:31 pm
Smith, Nos. 07-2732, 08-1993, 08-1994, 2009 U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:06 am
Carr, Nos. 14-449 (Jonathan) and 14-450 (Reginald), along with Kansas v. [read post]