Search for: "Doe v. Massachusetts Trial Court" Results 801 - 820 of 1,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Maryland and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that petitioner’s sole attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm
District Court for the District of Massachusetts in [patent infringement and interference actions]. [...] [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Mark Ashton
Citing the Marriage Act both the trial and Commonwealth Courts held that the statute required a couple to be of opposite sexes to claim a spousal tax benefit. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
New Jersey (2000), which strengthened the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury; Maryland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
United States Issue: Does United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
Co., 271 S.W.3d 76 (Tenn. 2008) (reversing trial court’s determination that no reasonable jury could determine that plaintiff was less than fifty percent at fault finding plaintiff demonstrated genuine issues of material fact); Hocker v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:53 pm
See Gormley v Robertson, 120 Wash.App. 31, 83 P.3d 1042 (2004) in which a Washington appellate court affirmed a trial court's application of the doctrine and distribution of the property acquired during the relationship between the two women. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:24 am by Susan Brenner
Werner, __ N.E.2d __, 2012 WL 1503256 (Massachusetts Court of Appeals 2012). [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 4:57 pm by John Elwood
It nonetheless argues that the court does not need to grant review now because the justices recently held in Harrow v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
” New York: The New York Supreme Court (trial level court) issued a decision (MSCI Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
 The federal Clean Air Act does give the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") the authority to regulate CO2 emissions as an "air pollutant," as the Supreme Court recently held in Massachusetts v. [read post]