Search for: "Does 1-152"
Results 801 - 820
of 869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2009, 9:37 am
LEFAVE, 1 SEARCH AND SEIZURE 68 (4th ed.). [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Jackson, 152 AD2d 54].The court's rationale: the individual is entitled to a minimum period of time to demonstrate his or her ability to successfully perform the duties of the position.* §3012(1)(b). provides that: "Principals, administrators, supervisors and all other members of the supervising staff of school districts . . . shall be appointed by the board of education . . . upon the recommendation of the superintendent of schools for a probationary period… [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Roberts, NO. 08-13753, 2009 WL 714329 (11th Cir., Mar. 19, 2009) it again affirmed that Booker does not apply to resentencings under § 3582(c)(2) pursuant to § 1B1.10(b)(1), id. at *1. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:58 am
" (NY Const art VIII, § 1). [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:58 am
" (NY Const art VIII, § 1). [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:18 am
Indiana Code section 32-17-4-1 permits parties who have never been married to file a partition action as to real property. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
Helvestine, 256 Va. 1, 6-8 (1998); Glovier v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:05 am
2009:66(2):152-161 Book Review: Human: The Science Behind What Makes Us Unique by Michael S. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
And for the children to have any further contact with the Respondent, significant therapeutic intervention is necessary.[152] It is remarkable that A. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:17 pm
The court also dismissed the arguments under Rule 9(b) that there was insufficient particularity regarding fraud allegations which apparently relied on Sections 152 and 157(b) of the DGCL. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 9:49 am
The court also dismissed the arguments under Rule 9(b) that there was insufficient particularity regarding fraud allegations which apparently relied on Sections 152 and 157(b) of the DGCL. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Gaylord Hospital, 1992 WL 43134, at *1-2 (Conn. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:58 pm
The Court held that: this case does not fit neatly into conventional business judgment rule jurisprudence, which assumes the presence of a free and competitive market to assess the value and merits of a transaction. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:44 pm
Gray v, Netherland, 518 u.s. 152, 165 (1996). [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:30 pm
Neovi Data Corp., 152 Cal.App.4th 86 (2007). [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
" Slip op. at 1. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:50 am
Ct. 1465, 152 L. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:35 am
Sec. 924(C) (Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:34 am
Ct. 828, 1 L. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
& Gas Corp., No. 146 In an action by a forestry worker injured on the job, alleging negligence by his employer for which defendant, which contracted with the employer to perform the work, should be held vicariously liable, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) a contractual obligation does not necessarily constitute a nondelegable duty in tort; and 2) on the facts of this case, liability could not be extended to defendant. [read post]
