Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 801 - 820
of 4,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2021, 6:36 am
However, the NRRA does not address how to determine the “home state” of an unaffiliated group. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:04 pm
Schools sometimes responsible for injuries after school hours.The South Main Street Elementary School in Pleasantville, N.J. had long preannounced a 1:30 p.m. early dismissal on a certain day in 2001. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:27 am
On 1 December 2020, the tenants, assisted by Justice for Tenants, applied to have the landlord added as a respondent. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:02 pm
The board therefore concludes that the amendment introduced into claim 1 of the sixth auxiliary request does not comply with the requirements of A 123(2). [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 am
Hankins, [41 S.W. 1028, 1030 (Tenn. 1897)]; Chambers v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
"Does Aid Reduce Anti-refugee Violence? [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
Because of that, the opinion we’re going to be examining does not identify the target who filed the Rule 41(g) seeking the return of evidence seized from his home and offices. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Rev. 1-55(2011).Highland, Howard L. [read post]
See(2)(A) You Later: Supreme Court Holds that DOJ Has Broad Dismissal Authority Even After Unsealing
21 Jun 2023, 9:59 am
Under FRCP 41(a), which the Third Circuit had applied, the standard varies with the case’s procedural posture. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 3:07 pm
P. 41(c)(1) should not be excluded where defendant was not present when the search of home took place because "there was neither a possibility of bad faith conduct on the part of the police, nor prejudice to the defendant," and "no substantial right of the defendant ha[d] been infringed"; therefore, the search was "reasonable" under the Fourth Amendment); Gamble v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:34 am
That decision led the parties to jointly stipulate to dismiss Doe's civil action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), thereby mooting the case. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:13 pm
(See, e.g., col. 1, I. 14; col. 1, II. 39-41) The claims are drawn to the user's vantage point (“presenting internet information to a user”), as compared to describing the underlying system by which images are (concurrently) rendered by the web server and image server (via the web browser) for viewing. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
Bracey, 41 N.Y.2d 296, 299, 392 N.Y.S.2d 412, 360 N.E.2d 1094). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:06 am
In particular, what was meant by the CJEU in Case 34/10 Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace eV [2012] 1 CMLR 41 [discussed here by the IPKat] by the expression "capable of commencing the process of development of a human being"? [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
TTABlogger comment: Note that the applications were not rejected as to the NY Times on-line columns (Class 41) but only as to its Class 9 goods. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
* Willow Tea Rooms: A tale of tea and trade marks (Part 2)InternKat Hayleigh Bosher hosts a tea party continues her analysis (see Part 1 here) regarding Ms Mulhern, owner of the mark The Willow Tea Rooms opposing the Willow Tea Rooms Trust attempt to register the mark “The Willow Tea Rooms” in classes 35, 41, 42 and 43. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Rev. 1 (2020) [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
That number is 41, as in 41 degrees Fahrenheit. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
FRCP 41(b). [read post]
