Search for: "Does 1-71" Results 801 - 820 of 2,544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
  The government declined to intervene, id. at *1, meaning:  (1) that it thought the suit not worth pursuing, and (2) the relator was free to pursue whatever allegations he wanted. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 pm by Orin Kerr
And "we have isolated three factors which contribute to the personal indignity endured by the person searched: (1) physical contact between the searcher and the person searched; (2) exposure of intimate body parts; and (3) use of force. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:55 pm by Thorsten Bausch
Where does the EPO now stand with regard to quality? [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:26 pm by Benson Varghese
The specific offense characteristic adjustment for the amount of loss is outlined in USSG §2B1.1(b)(1). [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:26 pm by Benson Varghese
The specific offense characteristic adjustment for the amount of loss is outlined in USSG §2B1.1(b)(1). [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:26 pm by Benson Varghese
The specific offense characteristic adjustment for the amount of loss is outlined in USSG §2B1.1(b)(1). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
For example, OHIM could allow communications by email, as the General Court does [What! [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Howard Knopf
That being said, parties are reminded that the Board does not need all existing relevant information to set fair tariffs. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:24 pm by Graham Smith
S.71(9) is explicit that the sender or recipient does not need to be a person, and that relevant communications data includes data identifying the location of any telecommunication system by means of which a communication is transmitted. [read post]