Search for: "Downing v. Municipal Court" Results 801 - 820 of 1,420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
The case for moot court this year was Carpenter v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:19 am by MBettman
” Justice DeWine, dissenting opinion On December 12, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Embassy Healthcare v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:52 am
The 8-1 ruling in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Virginia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm
They get more than enough signatures on the initiative proposal, so it's scheduled to go to the voters in November.But the California Supreme Court, in a rare pre-election review, strikes down the thing and removes it from the ballot, unanimously holding that the scope of the initiative is so radical and wide-ranging that it constitutes an impermissible "revision" of the California Constitution rather than a mere amendment. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:47 am by The Legal Blog
Jalgaon Municipal Council and Others [(1991) 3 SCC 91].In State of U.P and Another. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:00 pm by admin
Several states and municipalities passed laws addressing wage law violations. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:06 am by Unknown
  With this language about intent the City is attempting to expand the Illinois Supreme Court's ruling in Boub v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” At Turtle Talk, Jennifer Weddle notes that the court’s “restraint” in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Texas law requires that municipal contracts include a clause that the contractor will not boycott Israel. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of International Municipal Lawyers Association   Barr Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
Reagan National Advertising of Texas Inc., 20-1029, concerns the constitutionality of a municipal sign restriction. [read post]