Search for: "Edison v State"
Results 801 - 820
of 833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2008, 5:39 am
The federal district court ruling is Commercial Logistics Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:30 am
., a wayback machine entry dated before the critical date, the same evidence is - at this point - unlikely to be admissible in court due to hearsay issues.AFAIK, the wayback machine has overcome hearsay objections in only one case (Telewizja Polska United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
It stated that, in City of Anaheim v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:37 am
In Williams v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
The proposal to use electricity provoked legal wrangles between the Edison and Westinghouse companies which promoted, respectively, direct and alternating current.Following the first electrocution in 1890, Dr Alfred Southwick, the chair of the commission which recommended the electric chair, was reported as saying that "we live in a higher civilisation from this day"(5) though Thomas Edison reportedly "rebuked the doctors and said it was a mistake to have let them… [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Dept. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
While the petition does not specifically lay out what portions of the relevant statutes and United States Constitution the FCC violated, Verizon is clearly invoking the APA's arbitrary and capricious test. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 7:56 am
Southern California Edison Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 1:31 pm
" Kidd v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
The statute can survive strict scrutiny only if it is "narrowly tailored to promote a compelling government interest," United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 1:51 am
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York Inc. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 11:53 am
In State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
United States 54 USPQ2d 1519, 1530 (Ct. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Carmine Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:26 am
The Consolidated Edison Corp. [read post]
13 May 2007, 9:11 pm
The last paragraph of a BusinessWeek article on KSR states: Not everybody is cheering. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:34 pm
Patently-O has a May 2 post entitled: KSR v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:50 pm
Co v. [read post]
