Search for: "Edwards v. California"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2017, 9:22 am
Multi-Vehicle Crash Fatally Injures Merced Woman I’m Ed Smith, a Merced wrongful death lawyer. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The Center for Internet and Society blog has posted a series of comments on the California Consumer Privacy Act [pdf] The IpKat blog has a piece by Jessica Banks “Smart watches: a helping hand or sinister culture of surveillance? [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
, Bradford v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
John Deere, 383 US 1, 8-9 (1966).Edward C. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm
HCBS programs are especially vital in light of the Supreme Court’s Olmstead v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
Edwards Lifesciences(EPLAW) (IPKat) EWCA dismisses appeal against decision of Patents Court finding non-infringement: Occlutech GmbH v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:27 pm
Grutter v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:10 pm
The Supreme Court first recognized diversity in higher education as a "compelling" state interest in the 1978 ruling Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
” In any other year, King v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
There have been a couple of interesting cases involving social media: a HR manager bringing a constructive dismissal case against his former employer after a dispute over his LinkedIn profile; and the ongoing PhoneDog case in California raising the question of who owns a former employee’s Twitter account. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:43 am
District Judge Edward R. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
In Al-Bihani v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
Edwards Lifesciences(EPLAW) (IPKat) EWCA dismisses appeal against decision of Patents Court finding non-infringement: Occlutech GmbH v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Conservative MP and former Solicitor-General, Sir Edward Garnier, has sought to remove Amendment 2. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
§ 1182(f)—the same provision that the government cited to support the travel ban upheld by the Supreme Court term in Trump v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:13 am
California, 511 U.S. 318, 323 (1994). [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
