Search for: "FRED v. STATE" Results 801 - 820 of 1,012
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
Recent foodborne illnesses have raised questions about the legal status of tara (Caesalpinia spinosa) under United States food law. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
  According to Fred Mason, the president of the Maryland State and District of Columbia AFL-CIO, Perez fought to increase funding for the state occupational safety and health plan, which had been underfunded under Governor Robert Ehrlich. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 5:03 am by Russell Knight
  The United States Supreme Court has already ruled that Americans can do what they want in the privacy of their own bedroom, Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:46 am by royblack
” Words of wisdom from Justice Hugo Black as codified in Gideon v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
In an interview with The New York Times, Stevens talked about what he called a telling flaw in the opening sentence of the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am by Michael C. Dorf
He writes: Suppose that in 1924 this Court had expressly reaffirmed Plessy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Families Got Fed Up with Their States’ Politics. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
      Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
That clause states that only an “Officer” may succeed and act as president. [read post]