Search for: "First Circuit Court, State of Hawaii" Results 801 - 820 of 912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  In granting certiorari, the Court agreed to review a ruling of the Fourth Circuit which held that a TCPA exemption for government debt collectors was in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:57 pm
"Typically, such conduct is not sufficient to secure dismissal of criminal charges in the United States, due to US Supreme Court precedent in the case of United States v Alvarez-Machaim. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:59 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit grappled with reconciling the restrictions and their purpose of preventing corruption with the First Amendment and the various ways contractors could get around the ban. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:40 am by Joy Waltemath
But in the district court, Hawaii has signaled it would like to move forward, seeking court approval to file a second amended complaint. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
April 29, 2010).ArkansasThe Eighth Circuit has twice held that Arkansas law rejects innovator liability. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Democratic lawmakers often had no other recourse than to go to court because of President Trump’s approach. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:21 am by Nate Persily
Richardson (1966), the Court expressed considerable deference to the states' choice among different population bases for redistricting, when it allowed Hawaii to draw its districts based on equal numbers of registered voters per district. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 2:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the trial court, finding that the plaintiff plausibly alleged that the statute requires or encourages him to discriminate based on sex, which was sufficient to establish standing and raise a Fourteenth Amendment challenge.[8]   While California and Washington are currently the only states with mandatory diversity requirements, nearly all of the bills introduced in state legislatures in 2021 have… [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:39 pm by Mandelman
Baker… the people of Hawaii are very lucky to have you serving in their state’s legislature. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:40 am by Jim Sedor
Circuit Court of Appeals invoked the Supreme Court’s Citizen United decision to raise the bar for states to justify limiting campaign donations. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:30 am
 This is actually an interesting case which addresses issues of first impression for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am by Jim Sedor
Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Hawaii law that bans government contractors from donating to candidates. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 11:24 am by Michael Lowe
  Here, the impact of Texas being a part of the Fifth Judicial District for the United States Court of Appeals (“Fifth Circuit”) is important. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The court considered cases from the state of Washington and Colorado. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
(On occasion, Parliament short-circuited due process with bills of attainder.) [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
For example, the Colorado supreme court rejected mandatory reporting stating it was the first step toward mandatory pro bono — a destination the court did not want to arrive at, hence it would not take the first step. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
The first in-depth study of this phenomenon, the Brookings report identified prosecuted cases involving 78 perpetrators and more than 3,000 victims. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:04 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In addition, a number of other states are considering legislation to protect biometric data privacy, including Alaska, Delaware, Florida, Arizona, Hawaii, Oregon, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Rhode Island. [read post]