Search for: "Fischer v Fischer"
Results 801 - 820
of 957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 3:03 am
Likewise, defendant's fifth and sixth counterclaims have "no merit" because defendant failed to either rebut plaintiff's proof that the retainer agreement was legally sufficient or specify any legal theory upon which relief could potentially be granted (Ventura v Fischer, 21 Misc 3d 131[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52124[U], *2 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; see CPLR 3212 [b]). [*3] Finally, the District Court should have dismissed the seventh and eighth… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Fischer! [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am
Gill v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
Kent v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
First the old business: Seeing as you must have an Internet connection and apparently aren’t confined to a tower by a wicked stepmother, you already know about the Court’s big cert. grant in Fischer v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:52 pm
Mission Capital Advisors LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:51 pm
Mission Capital Advisors LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:15 am
Penn v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:12 am
Dohme v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
Landis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Kreiner v Fischer, 471 Mich 109 (2004). [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 9:04 am
In Kousisis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
Anderson, Fischer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm
He has the opinion in Fischer v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
Jeff Fischer for the defense, whose absence the commission had authorized in advance. [read post]
