Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 801 - 820
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2008, 8:40 am
DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment
Court Rejects Hospital's Claim That LMRA Precluded Workers' FLSA Compensation Claims
Hinterberger v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:33 am
Khouzam v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 1:57 pm
These courts have gone well beyond the holding and rationale of [California v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
The Ohio Supreme court tackled that issue a year ago in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 9:33 pm
She said she had no information, but noted that, since a local appeals court in the District of Columbia had required confrontation with lab analysts in drug cases, “court appearances required of chemists have increased by 500 percent. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Fisher will ague for Luis E. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:11 pm
See Fisher v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:41 am
Compare Empagran S.A. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:40 pm
Compare Empagran S.A. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 10:56 pm
Donovan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 10:27 pm
See Pfizer, 518 F.3d at 1367; (...)the district court also explicitly found that the prosecuting attorney (Tolomei) and one of the inventors (LeFebre) knew of the undisclosed RFO art. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Fieger, Nancy Fisher, and Fieger, Fieger, Kenney and Johnson, P.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:59 pm
Nelson joined by Tashima and Fisher) demand that the government show them the paperwork that makes an AUSA a special acting us attorney in this matter.Edwards v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 4:21 pm
The court also needs to findings as to what prescribed medication the defendant must take.U.S. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Harrington v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:45 am
The 9th (Trott joined by Wardlaw and Fisher) affirm the convicts, although chastising the district court, under plain error, for giving an instruction on materiality that did not track the language in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 6:11 pm
The case cite is Fisher Tool Co., Inc. v. [read post]
