Search for: "Flowers v. Flowers" Results 801 - 820 of 1,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am by Elizabeth Clark
Quoting West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021  In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021  East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22… [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-6289 Flowers v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-6289 Flowers v. [read post]
  Thus, because plaintiffs’ own testing revealed that the product consists of between 57.3% and 62.6% honey derived from Manuka flower, the product’s “chief floral source” is the Manuka flower and reasonable consumers would not be deceived by the label. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am by John Elwood
  To quote one of Chief Justice Rehnquist’s favorite (or at least most-invoked) poems, “full many a flower is born to blush unseen, and waste its sweetness on the desert air. [read post]