Search for: "GARNER v. STATE" Results 801 - 820 of 1,973
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:56 pm by kerry.sheehan
The most thoroughly developed of these proposes a legislative restructuring of copyright exhaustion in a flexible, multi-factor format, in part modeled on the United States’ fair use doctrine. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
V, pt. 1, § 3, the Governor is elected “by plurality of all of the votes returned. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit sua sponte consolidated the appeals en banc and affirmed by a one-vote margin, with no opinion garnering a majority of the judges on the Second Amendment issue. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:37 pm
S. 73, 80 (2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:18 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
” The form of virtual currency in the United State that has garnered the most notice is Bitcoin. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Marginal income tax rates in the mid-1980s were 70 percent on so-called unearned income, plus a few more percent tacked on by the states. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:18 am by Abbe Gluck
  It is hard to see a reasonable federal purpose here other than garnering more GOP votes for the struggling repeal bill. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ted Sichelman, University of San Diego School of Law As Patently-O has described in several posts (here, here, here), the Supreme Court is poised to decide the fate of the patent exhaustion doctrine in Impression Products v. [read post]