Search for: "GRATE v. STATE" Results 801 - 820 of 1,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2022, 11:30 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
  People like Justice Coney Barrett argue that I should be grateful for not having been aborted. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 8:20 pm by chucknewton
The McLeod case reminds me of a case in the Tyler, Texas Bankruptcy Court entitled Mooney v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm by Jeffrey W. Berkman, Esq.
 A Plan or the grating instrument can state that the options terminate or that the company has the right to determine how they will be treated. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
You would hope that public officials would be grateful that Mollo uncovered the town’s inadequate emergency response system and budget mismanagement. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
I am equally grateful that in developing the next generation of citizen lawyers the law school is emphasizing inclusion – a core value that has guided much of my work. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  Last week's rulings on pretrial motions in Earp v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
  Examples of both such highs and such lows reside in the recent case of Ezeb v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:40 pm by Léon Dijkman
This Kat was grateful to benefit from the insights of his old friend Martin Stierle, who followed the reform process closely. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]