Search for: "Garcia v Garcia"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 8:45 am
Garcia, No. 07-3779-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:59 am
" Garcia v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:06 am
Per U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:34 am
Let me simplify: in Garcia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 1:19 pm
You can read the petition for Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:03 pm
Code, § 2295; Borders Online, supra, at p. 1189; see also Garcia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:37 am
A Preview of Garcia v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:53 am
In REVERSING the order allowing Wilson Elser to withdraw as defense counsel, the Second Department reiterated New York's long-standing rule: The motion of Wilson Elser was a "poor vehicle" to test the propriety of the disclaimer of coverage and withdrawal of defense by James River (Brothers v Burt, 27 NY2d 905, 906; see Seye v Sibbio, 33 AD3d 608; Garcia v Zito, 242 AD2d 258; Pryer v DeMatteis Orgs., 259 AD2d 476). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Verret (George Mason University), on Thursday, April 25, 2019 Tags: Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Retail investors, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Surveys MFW Compliance in Controller-led transaction Olenik v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
In the latter category, we have Gallop v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v Horton, 9 AD3d 503 [3rd Dept 2004]… [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 4:33 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:38 pm
Garcia, No. 17-834. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 7:21 am
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm
I'm in the 9th Circuit and we have Garcia-Quintero v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 10:07 am
Saintubert allegedly lost control of the car he was driving and struck Rodriguez-Garcia’s Honda CR-V after he was hit by a dark-colored sport utility vehicle that reportedly fled the scene. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:09 am
Verrilli is well known for his involvememt in many of the most important, and controversial, copyright cases including the Grokster case, the Jammie Thomas case and even the Viacom v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm
I'm in the 9th Circuit and we have Garcia-Quintero v. [read post]