Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 801 - 820
of 76,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
”Given the parties’ conflicting submissions and contentions, the AD2 thought that a proper evidentiary hearing was needed and sent the matter back for a new determination.That’s a lot of work for $92.47.# # #DECISIONF. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
” That was the moniker given to Oklahoma v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:21 pm
With so much else going on in the sentencing world these days, I have not given much attention to Puckett v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:33 am
Walter v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:30 am
Walter v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:09 am
In Tarle v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:40 am
Fjerstad v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:09 am
The judiciary ought not to construe existing statutes so as to confer on the courts the function of deciding whether any given prisoner should lose his vote. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:56 pm
L. was given a 5 year prison offer through his prior attorney. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm
The plaintiff in Bennett v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:10 am
This is Part 2 of a post discussing the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:52 am
The post Case Previews: R v O’Brien, R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, and R v Mackle (Nos. 1, 2 and 3), and R v McLaughlin appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 4:59 am
Marsh, 481 U.S. 200 (1987), and Gray v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 11:20 pm
Later this month, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of Virginia v. [read post]
Jail suicide following alleged false arrest and striking with baton was not a Fourth Amendment claim
29 Mar 2007, 7:25 pm
Powers-Bunce v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
In Sandifer v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
Given that the last oral argument in this case was conducted in a classified setting, it shouldn’t be too much of a surprise if the sequel is conducted behind closed doors too: the parties submitted a joint letter conceding the need for a closed session, but indicating that that they would take the court’s questions that can be answered in public in an open session, as well. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 7:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
