Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 44,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
Nor did Janowiec v Russia (2013) App nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09 assist the claimant. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 11:52 am
Supreme Court decided Herring v. [read post]
On Delfi v Estonia… Is it time to adopt a good-Samaritan style exemption? – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm
It should be born in mind that in L’Oréal v eBay the CJEU stated 3 things: “The fact that the service provided by the operator of an online marketplace includes the storage of information transmitted to it by its customer-sellers is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that that service falls, in all situations, within the scope of Article 14(1) of Directive 2000/31” (at [113]). [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
When viewed in the light most favorable to the state, the court says the evidence is adequate. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:22 am
I secured it down real good just last week". [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
See Atonio v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:09 pm
In Eith v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:15 am
Russel v Russel stated that situations in which discretion against arbitration should be exercised are ‘few and exceptional. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
On February 21, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on a set of stay applications, consolidated under Ohio v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:36 pm
Good catch by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Hence Irwin LJ found that the “underlying principle in Zambrano is undisturbed by Chavez-Vilchez” and in the latter case the referring court was looking for guidance in circumstances where a child was dependent on one non-EU parent with no right of residence; circumstances in which the state must ensure a careful process of enquiry. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
This being so, there was insufficient evidence to establish validity of the two Community trade marks through the acquisition of distinctive character.Revocation of the CTMs for non-use From a review of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and especially the ONEL/OMEL case [Case C-149/11 Leno Merken, noted by the IPKat here], it appeared that the law was as follows: (i) the question of whether there has been ‘genuine use in the Community’ is not to be… [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:08 am
United States, 14-5703 applied the test set out in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 8:17 am
–Johnson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:02 am
On June 1, 2017, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Borcik v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 8:48 am
In Padilla v Kentucky, the Court will consider this issue. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
Such was the case in McNeal v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:08 pm
A good decision to review this area from the Court of Criminal Appeals is Kuciemba v. [read post]
