Search for: "Grand Jury Investigation, in Re"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 7:42 am
The case was In re grand jury proceedings (10-512). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
Citing Kovel and the public-relations case of In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 265 F. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 8:51 am
The court reversed the perjury conviction, holding that: “The primary function of the Grand Jury is to uncover crimes and misconduct in public office for the purpose of prosecution … It is not properly a principal aim of the Grand Jury, however, to ‘create’ new crimes in the course of its proceedings. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:02 pm
[xiv] In 2003, Bonds testified to a federal grand jury and stated that he did not use steroids. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 12:53 pm
But from all those very ordinary facts, a man is dead and the D.A., the grand jury, the police chief and the Mayor all apparently find no one blameworthy. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:07 pm
Moreover, many of the legitimate things the government can do with Section 215 can be accomplished in other ways—with grand jury subpoenas or with pen registers, for example. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 11:19 am
A grand jury has returned no charges against Louisville policemen for killing Breonna Taylor, writes The Associated Press, though one of the officers was charged for shooting into the house next door. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am
Capturing the Friedmans won the Grand Jury Prize at Sundance Film Festival and was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:57 pm
State investigator obtains indictment of nurse for neglecting patient at Frankfort, Ky. facility by testifying falsely to grand jury. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:09 pm
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell posted the latest episode of the Lawfare Podcast, a conversation between Benjamin Wittes and Solomon Wisenberg on Wisenberg’s experience interviewing a sitting president as part of a grand jury investigation. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 7:23 am
That means the judge or jury can infer from a witness’ invocation that the answer they would have given would have been damaging to their case. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
As Senate Republicans’ continued insistence on investigating the origins of the FBI’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election suggests, some of these efforts may be backward-looking to actions from within the executive branch that they believe disadvantaged Trump. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 11:13 am
Nobody can be charged with a federal crime unless a jury indicates they’re guilty of committing one. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 6:45 am
You're the Chairman of the Committee; get the damned documents, and make sure you know what the hell you're talking about. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:44 am
Read it, and ask yourself, should he be making statements like that regarding an ongoing criminal investigation before a state grand jury? [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am
§ 2518(8)(b); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 841 F.2d 1048, 1053 n.9 (11th Cir. 1988) (“applications” in the statute includes affidavits and related documentation). [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:57 pm
Having said that, it is important to understand the consequences of which a person is exposed in making that choice: It could result in serious harm or death as the officer retaliates; The suspect who used deadly force against an officer to protect themselves will likely be arrested and a criminal investigation will ensue; The suspect may be charged with aggravated assault or homicide if the force used by the police officer did not exceed the lawful amount of force needed under the law; In… [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 12:35 am
There is simply no such public interest benefit from the government investigating athletes.The New York Times quoted a law prof saying a "message has to be sent to the public" when a high profile person appears to get away with defying federal prosecutors and the grand jury. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:18 am
...Once upon a time the grand jury system was devised as a way of protecting the reputations of those accused of crime unless there was sufficient evidence to warrant a trial. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 6:54 am
" Wait a minute, the first quote says Hood didn't make the decision to settle the criminal prosecution until he heard from his investigator at the grand jury that there were no grounds for indictments. [read post]
