Search for: "HAIR v. STATE"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2011, 5:08 am
For starters, the Supreme Court said in the famous SEC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
In that case, L'Anza manufactured and sold shampoos, conditioners and other hair care products. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:55 am
Even though natural hair braiding is, well, natural, the Hoosier State previously forced braiders to comply with the state’s tangled mess of cosmetology licensing laws. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:17 pm
No. 403 v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:32 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Waters v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:05 am
In Tandon v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 6:52 am
A joint status report by the United States Department of Justice, the 36 state AGs, and Google was filed on Tuesday (PDF). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:26 pm
In Anthony v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:46 am
And yet five Appeals Court justices could not agree on the meaning of that disclaimer (DeWolfe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:58 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit issued Wednesday in Khatib v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:14 pm
This waiver of attorney-client privilege was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Clark v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:30 am
United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 10:25 am
This could be her elephantState v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:53 pm
The recent Fifth Circuit opinion in Flagg v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
California v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:22 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:34 am
It could be argued, as in the Onassis v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:06 pm
(See Covenant Care, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:18 pm
See, e.g., Crews v. [read post]
