Search for: "HAIR v. STATE"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 9:17 am
– everything from hair sampling methods to bite mark analysis to arson investigation – was greatly unreliable. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:00 am
The employee worked at a hair salon. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am
Such relief is rarely granted under New York law, where, as in the case at bar, the movant would be receiving the ultimate relief pendente lite and could ultimately be compensated through monetary damages, Rosa Hair Stylists Inc. v Jaber Food Corp., 218 AD2d 793 (2d Dep’t 1995); see Matos v City of New York, 21 AD3d 936 (2d Dep’t 2005); Neos v Lacey, 291 AD2d 434 (2d Dep’t 2002). [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:49 pm
STEFAN V. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
That may be splitting hairs, but that’s what lawyers often do—split hairs. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:04 pm
The article states that two men wearing masks entered a Shell gas station on Lincoln Street shortly after 3am this past Thursday. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Riva v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:41 am
In the recent case of Flood v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
The case of Sutherland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am
The Washington Post carries a rare look inside the al-Hair high-security prison in Saudi Arabia, which is currently the home of nearly 1,100 prisoners, all jailed on terrorism-related charges. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
We live our lives in a continual state of low level bundle rage. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm
The decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:17 am
don’t change a hair for me, not if you care for me. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:55 am
EFF is asking the Supreme Court to hear arguments in Raynor v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:24 am
Zall v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:43 am
This case is: Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:45 am
In Friedhofer v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 2:25 pm
(Religious Freedom; Prisoners, Hair Length) * U.S. [read post]